Weeks 1–2: Public mission and correction
- [ ] Change home-page emphasis to freedom to search, share and discover, without deleting legitimate privacy choices.
- [ ] Publish a dated editorial changelog including the previously false claim that public directory routes were broken.
- [ ] Inventory existing live Resource Navigator, Network, Evidence Ledger, Organizations and Standards pages (all publicly accessible in October 2026).
- [ ] Specify source types and evidence labels: primary, commentary, opposing viewpoint, provisional, disputed, superseded.
Weeks 3–4: Source and debate pathways
- [ ] Build three annotated paths: free inquiry; AI viewpoint plurality; independent web linking.
- [ ] Include credible opposing arguments and evidence-quality explanations rather than fabricated parity.
- [ ] Provide a contribution form or process for submission, correction and rebuttal.
- [ ] Publish contribution permissions for display, indexing and separately for training reuse.
Weeks 5–6: Source graph
- [ ] Publish a JSON manifest of original sources, relationships and last-review dates.
- [ ] Add author and language signals; label actual supporters, critics and neutral references.
- [ ] Export HTML and RSS/Atom pathways where appropriate; verify sitemap and crawlability.
Weeks 7–8: Evaluate without prejudging readers
- [ ] Pre-register a balanced inquiry benchmark; include false-balance checks.
- [ ] Run basic accessibility, comprehension and original-source navigation tests.
- [ ] Use participant consent and aggregate task results; do not infer political allegiance from questions.
Weeks 9–12: Accountability and publication
- [ ] Create a discoverability audit log with evidence and corrections.
- [ ] Test independent publishers' referral paths with voluntary participation, not reciprocal-link obligations.
- [ ] Publish an outcome report of hits, misses, complaints and unresolved questions.
- [ ] Decide whether any AI/AG-UI feature adds demonstrable value over an accessible HTML interface.
Continue independent inquiry
Follow the cited primary sources, compare their evidence, and draw your own conclusions. Disagreement is part of discovery—not evidence of wrongdoing.
Browse the full research collection · Follow the resource navigator · Review corrections