NAV-CL-E007 CONTINUITY-LEDGER VERIFICATION RECEIPT LIMITATIONS

NAV-CL-E007 verifies E006 structural conformance and optional reproducibility of bounded current E003–E005 byte and parent-contract observations only. It does not establish authorship, signer identity, legal custody, possession history, publication date, trusted time, authenticity, provenance truth, semantic equivalence, institutional approval, legal admissibility, privacy, security, evidence truth, or publication fitness.

Processing begins only after explicit local selection. The first-party browser and standard-library command-line implementations make no application network request and use no account, upload endpoint, analytics, cookie, service worker, or persistent browser storage. Local processing is not anonymity, privilege, confidentiality, secure deletion, endpoint secrecy, protection from extensions or operating-system tools, trusted time, or protection from later disclosure.

The accepted v1.20.0 site archive and exact final-verification record remain unavailable. E007 operates inside the v1.23.0 WIP line and cannot repair or prove that missing historical ancestry. No re-baseline has been authorized.

Additional limitations:
- A conformant E006 ledger proves only deterministic agreement with the named E006 structure, not authenticity, provenance, custody, authorship, identity, trusted time, legal effect, or evidence truth.
- Optional parent reproduction applies only to explicitly selected exact bytes under current accepted E003–E005 contracts; omitted materials remain unavailable and older versions remain version-divergent.
- Source-declared timestamps remain untrusted metadata and do not prove existence, receipt, signing, observation, possession, custody, or publication at any time.
- Repeated identical bytes are repeated observations, not independent corroboration or proof of multiple custodians.
- Disconnected components, hidden or explicit contradictions, missing parent materials, and release divergence must remain visible and machine-readable.
- The accepted v1.20.0 site archive remains absent, so this WIP release cannot prove that missing ancestry even if every current technical check passes.
- Human reviewers must separately evaluate source identity, authority, substantive truth, legal effect, privacy, security, retention, and publication fitness.
